Mitch's Blog
Newsletter Mitchellaneous About Social Search Also on Micro.blog
  • Face It. Trump Is a Normie Republican.

    Jamelle Bouie at The New York TImes:

    If signed into law, the Senate version of Trump’s policy bill would slash $1.1 trillion from Medicaid and $186 billion from anti-poverty food assistance to help pay for trillions in tax breaks, including more than $564 billion in business tax cuts. By one estimate, these changes would result in at least 17 million people losing their health insurance over the next decade, as well as millions losing SNAP benefits, with some states possibly even ending their programs. All this so that the top 1 percent of households can receive an estimated average of a few tens of thousands of dollars each year.

    But as irresponsible as this bill is, there is a dog-bites-man element to its existence. If we understand that Trump is, in most respects, an ordinary Republican president, then it is not news to learn that a Republican president wants to cut social services for the poor to sustain a large tax cut for the rich.

    …

    This reality extends, at least somewhat, to foreign policy.

    What, so far, has been the signature foreign policy action of the Trump administration? A strike on Iran’s nuclear program. With one decision, Trump fulfilled the dreams of a generation of Republican hawks who have been clamoring for war with — and regime change in — Iran since President Bush proclaimed that it was a member of the “axis of evil” in 2002.

    …

    Across both the first Trump administration and this one, what you see are the longstanding goals of the Republican Party being fulfilled by a Republican president. What’s striking isn’t that this is happening, but that Trump, in his 10 years on the American political scene, has successfully obscured his rigidly partisan agenda with claims of populism and ideological heterodoxy. His occasional gestures toward support for existing social programs or greater taxes on the rich — and his willingness to say anything to amass power — are enough to persuade many voters (and some professional political observers) that Trump will somehow moderate the Republican Party or turn it away from its traditional agenda. If anything, it’s been the opposite: Trump’s willingness to do everything favored by his partisan fellow travelers has only accelerated the Republican Party’s dash toward ideological and policy extremism.

    …

    To look at the Trump administration and see something distinct from the past 44 years of Republican governance is to inhabit a fantasy in which past Republican presidents weren’t similarly contemptuous of legal and constitutional limits on their authority.

    …

    When George W. Bush left office in 2009, the United States was mired in two wars and the global economy was in free fall. When Donald Trump left office after his first term, the United States was mired in a deadly pandemic and its economy was recovering from a free fall. (And this is to say nothing of Trump’s attempt to overturn the results of the 2020 election in a desperate bid to stay in office.)

    That’s two Republican presidencies over 20 years that ended in disaster. There is no reason to think that Trump’s second term will be the exception that breaks the rule.

    → 2:00 PM, Jul 3
    Also on Bluesky
  • Congressman Issa falsely claims ‘criminal illegals’ are enrolled in Medicaid

    → 1:17 PM, Jul 3
    Also on Bluesky
  • Which ‘wow’ skill is secretly super easy to learn? : r/AskReddit

    → 12:17 PM, Jul 3
    Also on Bluesky
  • I am a regular user of an LLM chatbot (ChatGPT). It’s becoming essential to my work and life. And I also hate vendors' efforts to stuff AI into everything.

    If I do a Web search, I want search results, not an AI summary. Likewise, Gmail email summaries are an abomination.

    LLM chatbots like ChatGPT are good for answering questions. Search engines are good for finding websites. Two different jobs. And I know how to read email — I don’t need AI help with that.

    → 12:02 PM, Jul 3
    Also on Bluesky
  • Prices of Both Housing And Rent Are Decreasing In China. “In 2016, Xi said that houses were for living in, not for speculating. The Chinese government took steps to reduce prices, those steps took time to bear fruit.” By Ian Welsh.

    → 11:47 AM, Jul 3
    Also on Bluesky
  • When an Internet service is not responding the best thing you can do is click the button over and over again, dozens of times if necessary, getting more angry and frustrated. Follow me for more helpful tech tips.

    → 3:54 PM, Jul 2
    Also on Bluesky
  • Warnings that AI will take people’s jobs re the latest way for CEOs to keep workers afraid and submissive.

    → 1:57 PM, Jul 2
    Also on Bluesky
  • Trump’s Immigration Enforcement: Free The Criminals, Jail The Innocent:

    They’re literally freeing dangerous criminals while manufacturing cases against innocent people…. The Trump admin is literally freeing a repeat violent offender in exchange for testimony against Abrego–a man with no criminal history who was working and raising a family.

    And Trump cut a deal with Salvadoran dictator Nayib Bukele “to let actual top MS-13 gang leaders go free.”

    — Mike Masnick at Techdirt

    → 1:48 PM, Jul 2
  • Welcome to the Age of Disappearance

    Hamilton Nolan:

    [Trump’s tax and immigration bill] contains enough money to build a new system of immigration detention centers far bigger than the entire federal prison system. The American Immigration Council says that it will be enough to facilitate the “daily detention of at least 116,000 non-citizens.” It will let ICE hire more field agents than the FBI. Its $170 billion in funding for Stephen Miller’s rabid campaign to purge America of brown people is comparable to the total annual funding for the United States Army.

    …

    This budget will give [Trump] the final piece of the puzzle that he needs to achieve his fever dream: a nationwide army of masked, unaccountable armed agents empowered to snatch anyone they like off the streets, and the physical infrastructure to imprison or deport those people at will. Thousands of men with guns, unrestrained by judges or local police, who do not answer to Congress, who point guns at the press, who arrest whoever they want, for reasons they do not share, and do whatever they wish with those people. The implications of this are going to make America a much darker place.

    …

    Yesterday, Trump proudly attended the opening of a concentration camp. There will be many more to come.

    → 1:35 PM, Jul 2
    Also on Bluesky
  • Dave Winer: New York City is “a tough place to govern.”

    The thing about NY that people might not understand is that the politics are dirty and fucked up. Dems tend to elect handsome young heros who when they have to deal with NYPD and the sanitation workers, the teachers union, and the federal government, also the ancient infrastructure, melt.

    → 1:21 PM, Jul 2
    Also on Bluesky
  • How do you save your best AI prompts for reuse? Do you just drop them in a text document on your desktop, or is there a better way?

    → 11:50 AM, Jul 2
    Also on Bluesky
  • Currently reading: A Wizard of Earthsea by Ursula K. Le Guin 📚

    → 9:51 PM, Jul 1
    Also on Bluesky
  • Currently re-reading: Getting Things Done by David Allen 📚

    → 9:51 PM, Jul 1
    Also on Bluesky
  • Currently reading: Mark Twain by Ron Chernow 📚

    → 9:50 PM, Jul 1
    Also on Bluesky
  • Mitchellaneous Vol. XCIV: Twelve things I saw on the Internet





    Crossing America in a 1964 stationwagon. Art Shay.



     Chicago, IL, January, 1956. Photo by Vivian Maier 







    → 8:59 AM, Jul 1
  • Mitchellaneous Vol. XCIII: Ten things I saw on the Internet



    O Monstro do Espaço (The Star Beast) by Robert A. Heinlein. Portuguese edition, 1982. 








    → 8:59 AM, Jun 30
    Also on Bluesky
  • ”american leftists seem extremely focused on anti imperialism (good) but rarely- if at all- discuss decolonization in their own fucking country, despite acknowledging that it is a settler colonial state. “

    → 9:57 PM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
  •  Mamdani and Zionism. 

    → 9:33 PM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
  • The New York Times and Fox News agree — the New York subway is scary. Hamilton Nolan disagrees.

    Nolan:

    Subway’s not scary. It’s fine and safe. It’s full of women and children. There are tons of old ladies on there. You should def be helping those old ladies carry their grocery carts up the stairs. That is an issue we can discuss. The rest of the stuff, I don’t know what you’re talking about.

    You sound real corny being scared of the subway.

    When I say this, you may read my meaning to be, “The subways are fine if you are brave,” or “Riding the subway is a character-building because it teaches you to be tough.” No. I’m not saying that. I’m saying that the subway is fine. It is not scary. It is the standard mode of transportation for millions of New Yorkers. Six million rides a day. Let me try to put it in terms that a non-New Yorker can understand. “I am scared of riding the Google shuttle bus to my job at Google.” “I am scared of riding the Epcot monorail.” See how crazy that sounds? Same basic thing.

    Most of the people who live outside the city drive cars to work. This is far more dangerous than riding the subway. Last year there were ten murders in the NYC subway system, with well over a billion total rides taken. During the same time period, there were 253 traffic fatalities in New York City. One person dead every day and a half. Cars? Those things are fucking dangerous. The subway? You might be tempted to buy a churro. Could be damaging to your diet, yeah. But you can work it off. Don’t make such a big deal out of it.

    There are homeless people on the subway. They are there because they have no homes. Some of them are mentally ill. If you ride the subway a lot, it is possible that you will see a homeless person who does not smell good sleeping on a train. It is possible that you will see a mentally ill person ranting and raving. This may make you uncomfortable. But imagine how they feel. Not only are they homeless, but they are also in need of mental health treatment, and they don’t have it, and instead they are consigned to riding a train all day, where people constantly move away from them and view them with disgust. An awful fate.

    What might a serious policy response to this situation look like, from mature adults who take this issue seriously? Is it… “have cops with guns arrest them all?” Come on. Give me a freaking break. Stupid Rambo ass policy. A real solution would involve a serious investment in mental health and housing programs, and then having a dedicated team of outreach workers who can go onto subways and connect the homeless people there to the services they need. Incidentally, this is Zohran Mamdani’s proposal. When Serious Political Thinkers talk about it, they say “he wants to defund the police.”

    → 1:44 PM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
  • On r/AskReddit: What things in porn actually happen in real life?. Pizza is delivered.

    → 1:21 PM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
  • Seriously, use the browser you like, don’t worry about battery. Matt Birchler has advice for Mac users.

    → 10:44 AM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
  • Nations Are People. Do you deserve to die for your own bad government?

    Hamilton Nolan:

    If you live in America, your government is run by Donald Trump. Ugh. You might despise that guy. You might have worked hard against him during campaign season. When you visit another country, and tell them that you are American, you might add, “But don’t judge me!” You would not want to be branded with the weight of the various stupid and despicable actions of your own government. You understand, first, that you do not agree with those things, and second, that you as a regular person have little power to affect those things. You are just living your life. You want to be respected as a human being.

    “Unfortunately, this simple and intuitive understanding of the difference between the government and the people of your own country often evaporates–or gets erased–when the discussion turns to foreign countries. When someone says “Russia,” you probably think of Putin, not of the teenage girl dreaming of what she will do after graduation. When someone says “Iran,” you probably think of something that is often referred to as “the regime,” rather than of the laughing family gathering for a holiday meal. This mental mistake, this unwitting juxtaposition of one thing for a different thing, is like a steamroller that paves the way for you to accept unacceptable things. You would never nod sagely and agree that a bomb should be dropped on a child. But air strikes to “cripple” the “command and control” of a “hostile regime?” Well, of course, serious people understand that this may be necessary in the grand chessboard that is geopolitics.

    …

    Are you willing to be killed for your own government’s sins? Are you willing to have your house destroyed and your child hit by shrapnel and your elderly parents lose access to medicine because of the policies of the latest president? If that seems unfair for you, it is unfair for anyone, anywhere. From this perspective, it is easy to see that the hurdle that a war must clear to be truly moral is so high that it stretches up into the clouds. Grounding ourselves in this perspective–always holding people, and their right to live, in the forefront of our minds–is the only way to make clear judgments about what our own government does with its killing machines.

    → 10:43 AM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
  • Promises The ‘Trump Phone’ Would Be ‘Made In USA’ Lasted 1/100th Of A Scaramucci. The Trump organization has scrubbed its website of claims that the phone would be made in America. Now the site has handwaving about how the phone will be infused with “American values.” By Karl Bode at Techdirt.

    → 10:23 AM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
  • What is a democratic socialist?

    → 9:52 AM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
  • Cross the Courts Off the List: We have enough information to conclude that the law won’t save us.

    Hamilton Nolan:

    The most significant remaining opportunity for course correction is the midterm elections. It is not so much that the elections (which if history is any guide should cause Republicans to lose control of Congress) are a magic wand that will fix our broken democracy, any more than, you know, Obama’s election fixed America. It is instead the much more modest but vital hope that Republicans can still lose power in elections. The midterm elections will be a test not so much of whether the Democratic Party will finally become the heroic resistance heroes we need–they won’t–but rather a test of whether Trump and Co. will have it together to suppress the vote to the degree that elections, also, need to be crossed off the list of fruitful avenues of opposition.

    We are going to see ICE agents at polling places, and politically motivated government investigations of political opponents, and possibly a number of non-Republican politicians and activists arrested and put in jail. That will be the setting of the midterm elections. Trump is a man who does not believe in even the abstract concept of losing an election. He is surrounded by yes men top to bottom in the federal government, and he has armies of armed agents at his disposal. The midterm elections are going to be a very, very important gut check for our democracy, and the extent to which it still functions. We, all of us, all of civil society, must protect the integrity of those elections at all costs. If the Trump administration is able to suppress the vote so severely that the midterms cannot be seen as fair, we are in an even worse place than we are now.

    Having given up on the possibility of a Supreme Court line in the sand, I am now looking at those elections as the next most important data point about how much hope is left to return to our traditional standard of “normal.” Apart from the elections, the other meaningful source of opposition is: Us. People. I have hoped that organized labor could be the rallying point for popular opposition to dictatorship. So far, that hasn’t happened. Institutionally, the long decline in union power has rendered organized labor extremely ineffective, disorganized in the face of a war on the existence of public sector unions, and unable to act in a powerful, concerted fashion on a nationwide scale. It is still possible, however, for unions to be one part of a grassroots coalition that forms to battle this out. The national protest movement we have seen arise–most recently the “No Kings” protests–shows me that the bulk of public opinion is on the right side here. The fascists are a minority. Stopping their advance, though, will require funneling the public opposition into organizations, into all facets of direct actions. What we have now is the sentiment, but not the organization. It can be built. The situation is not, in any sense, hopeless. There is much more to be said about the mechanics of all this, but for now, join an organization that is in the fight, and fight.

    It’s just that the path is narrower. We don’t gain anything by telling ourselves fairy tales about what is coming. If the courts won’t do their ostensible job of saving us then it is time to think of the law not as the arena of our salvation but as a minefield to pick our way around carefully en route to a more promising destination.

    → 9:50 AM, Jun 29
    Also on Bluesky
← Newer Posts Page 37 of 257 Older Posts →
  • RSS
  • JSON Feed