Mitch's Blog

New York Socialist City. Where taking care of everyone is common sense. “… what socialism really means in the context of US politics is public services for the public good. Using government to socialize the things that can help everyone, rather than allowing the private market to run everything in a way that preys on the public for private gain. As a practical matter, this is what most people trying to Do Socialism in American politics are trying to do. Full state control of the economy is not and has never been on the table.” www.hamiltonnolan.com/p/new-yor…

In retrospect it is obvious that drinking 48 ounces of cappuccino and Coke Zero in the two hours prior to my taking a window seat on a full three hour flight was not conducive to my comfort and would not endear me to the two other people seated in my row.

Like many people, I swear a lot, and I’m even a little proud of it. But I have resolved to reduce swearing to special occasions after reading this article in The New York Times: “Why Does Everybody Swear All The Time Now?". And that’s even though I disagree with the conclusions of the article.

Swearing has become meaningless noise, like saying “um” or “like.” It’s just something people say to convey unearned edginess or rebelliousness. Dropping “F” bombs doesn’t make me cowboy, it just makes me like millions of other people who also swear a lot.

As a writer, I am aware of economy of language and too often swearing serves no purpose. Save it for times when it really matters.

As for the Times article: It starts out well enough. Mark Edmundson, a professor at the University of Virginia, talks about the previous rules of decorum for when swearing was appropriate. “These days, curse words fill the air like angry drones – an ambient buzzing of bitter, nasty words,” he says, which is a nice turn of phrase. Also, this: “A sprinkle of salt gives your dinner savor; a handful kills it.”

But here’s the part where I disagree:

When you curse compulsively you produce a view of the world that’s smaller and meaner.

…

Omnipresent cursing, the programmatic reduction of nearly everything, pollutes our worldview. It makes it harder to see what is true and good and beautiful. We become blind to instances of courage and compassion. Our world shrinks. And we shrink along with it.

On the other hand, the willingness to use decent words suggests a decent heart and mind.

To that I say: Bulls—

I mean, nonsense.

I don’t think swearing makes us meaner people. Plenty of great people swear a lot, and plenty of awful people refrain from profanity. But swearing has become noise, and I’m aware it makes some people uncomfortable, so I’m just going to dial it back and save it for rare occasions.

Yesterday I unplugged as much as I could from social media and national political news, to the extent that’s possible for someone like me. I felt pretty good about that so I think I’ll see if I can do the same today.

Alas, my idea of “unplugging” looks like a normal person’s “fanatically online.”

I am trying to at least partly unplug from the national political news today.

Micro.blog, the service I use to host mitchw.blog does not support likes and reblogs. Micro.blog proprietor Manton Reece @manton decided deliberately to not support likes or reblogs, because he sees those as contributing to social media toxicity.

I fundamentally disagreed with Manton when I started on Micro.blog, but I have come around to his view about “likes.” They’re just noise. I try to avoid looking at them on my posts. I do still sometimes click a like on other people’s posts. Other people seem to like “likes,” so why not?

But I still think reblogs are great. They are a primary means of sharing content on Mastodon, BlueSky and especially Tumblr. I don’t mind that I can’t publish reblogs on Micro.blog — linking, cutting-and-pasting and screenshots are fine. But the fact that Micro.blog won’t show me boosts on Mastodon keeps me from shutting down my Mastodon account and just relying on Micro.blog as my presence in the fediverse.

An E-bike For The Mind. E-bikes and what they can teach us about AI. joshbrake.substack.com

Four Theories of Meta. Laughable, smart, evil and terrifying. www.infinitescroll.us/p/four-th…

Dogs start the day with a spoonful of Alpo or some other canned meat on top of a heap of patented, vitaminized kibble. In no time the meal is gobbled down and the dish licked clean and, like as not, poked noisily about the kitchen like a hockey puck, amid waggings. But I can recall another era, when every dog took a quick first look into his dish, to see what was in there. It was different each morning, but might contain a last chunk of pot roast or ham hock, plus gravy, from the previous night’s dinner table, a scraping of scrambled eggs, a slice or two of stale bread, leftover lima beans or spinach, a fresh but limp carrot, a splash of milk, and a half-bitten doughnut. It went down just as fast and probably did no harm, but what I’m getting at here is the old phrase “a dog’s breakfast,” because that’s what this book is. A mélange, a grab bag, a plate of hors d’oeuvres, a teenager’s closet, a bit of everything. A dog’s breakfast.

— Roger Angell, “This Old Man: All in Pieces.”

I have found a simple fix for a pebble in my shoe since I resumed blogging in earnest a few years ago: Finding some way to signal to people that I’m posting almost entirely the same things on my blog and all my socials. Today, I saw the easy answer on Nick Heer’s blog pxlnv.com : Instead of saying “follow me… “ say “follow this blog.” Problem solved! I have added the appropriate text to my blog header.

A new bill would grant Marco Rubio the right to declare any U.S. citizen a terrorist supporter based solely on their speech, and revoke their passport. “In March, Secretary of State Marco Rubio stripped Turkish doctoral student Rümeysa Öztürk’s of her visa based on what a court later found was nothing more than her opinion piece critical of Israel.” The proposed law would give Rubio similar power over U.S. citizens. theintercept.com/2025/09/1…

Nicholas Kulish at The New York Times:

In February 2020, the actor Noah Wyle decided the moment was ripe to bring back his most successful television character, Dr. John Carter from the hospital drama “ER.”

Mr. Wyle wrote an email to John Wells, who had served as the showrunner on “ER,” to propose a “character study in the vein of LOGAN, PICARD and JOKER.” He described his idea for the show as “a 12-episode Hulu limited series, where we take another look at the guy who showed us the world the first time,” adding: “Darker and grittier. Aged. But still him.”

“Get a few band members together,” he suggested to Mr. Wells, “and write a beautiful new song in an old and familiar key.”

From the kernel of that idea emerged the hit HBO Max hospital drama “The Pitt"….

I find this question of copyright law fascinating. When does using genre tropes trend over into copyright infringement? A serialized TV show set in an emergency room is going to have to follow certain story formulas. It’s going to be fast-paced, will use a lot of medical jargon, etc.

My gut feeling as an Internet lawyer is that “The Pitt” is going to lose this one if it goes to court. No one is disputing that “The Pitt”’s creators and the Crichton estate were in talks to make an ER sequel. And Noah Wylie plays the main character, an ER attending physician.

As the article points out, it ended up being a better creative choice to not have the show be an ER sequel. When you create a sequel, it’s creatively limiting — cameos and guest spots by former stars, and so forth. Hard to maintain the fourth wall of viewer disbelief.

Also: copyright should not extend 17 years past the death of the author. “ER” should be in the public domain. I am firmly a Doctorovian on this matter; copyright is a brilliant invention and should be limited, as America’s Founders intended.

Also: We love “The Pitt.”

Also: Noah Wylie’s character on “ER” vs. “The Pitt” are internally inconsistent in a fundamental way: John Carter on ER was heir to a fortune who, by the end of the series, was running his own clinic with the support of that fortune. His character on “The Pitt” is head of the ER, but he answers to the hospital bureaucracy and is apparently living on his doctor’s salary. Different people.

Charlie Kirk’s allies warn Americans: Mourn him properly or else. Republicans love cancel cuture when they’re the ones doing it. www.reuters.com/world/us/…

San Diego Navy doctor fired after right-wing activists find pronouns on social media. Hate, ignorance and bigotry score another win. www.kpbs.org/news/loca…

Shocked by Epstein’s birthday book? That culture was everywhere before feminism [Rebecca Solnit]. Child sexual abuse was everywhere in the U.S. in the 1970s and was celebrated in pop culture in movies like “Pretty Baby,” and stories abut rock stars and teen groupies. www.theguardian.com/commentis…

It’s Time for Americans to Start Talking About “Soft Secession.” “States don’t have to actively resist. They can simply refuse to help. And without state cooperation, much of the federal government’s agenda becomes unenforceable.” cmarmitage.substack.com/p/its-tim…

Charlie Kirk’s assassination is influencers all the way down. “In the immediate aftermath of the murder, everyone had something stupid to say.” todayintabs.com

Blogging for me is an attempt to balance how posts will look on the blog in desktop vs. mobile, in the newsletter on desktop and mobile, in Mastodon and on Bluesky. It’s always a compromise, and I change my habits every few weeks depending on which platform seems most important.

Charlie Kirk’s alleged killer scratched bullets with gaming catchphrases and symbols and a furry sex meme theverge.com

Ted Cruz AI bill could let firms bribe Trump to avoid safety laws, critics warn. arstechnica.com