I think I will reread “Funny Papers,” by Tom De Haven, first of a trilogy of novels that I loved, about the writers and artists behind a fictitious newspaper comic strip featuring a boy named Derby Dugan. The novels span New York in the 1890s-1970s, exploring the worlds of the newspaper industry, pop culture and life in those eras. The books are beautiful and sad; the comic strip brings joy to millions of people but not to its creators, who are miserable sods. That doesn’t sound like a fun read, but it is. I am highly romantic about midcentury New York, a place and time that I missed by a few years.

I wrote a review of “Derby Dugan’s Depression Funnies,” the second book in the series: A talking dog and puckered shoes: Derby Dugan’s Depression Funnies

When I first read that novel, I had no idea it was part of a trilogy; I was surprised and delighted to find the first novel, “Funny Papers,” years later, and then surprised and delighted again a few years later to find the third novel, “Dugan Underground.” The first novel, “Funny Papers,” covers the golden age of tabloid yellow journalism in the 1890s, “Depression Funnies” is about the peak of newspaper comic strips in the 1930s, when newspaper cartoonists were millionaire pop stars, and the final novel is about the hippie counterculture underground comic scene in the 1960s and 70s.

I’m gratified to see that De Haven is still alive and working, according to Wikipedia, though I’m disappointed to see that he apparently hasn’t produced a novel in 20 years. On the other hand, there are a few novels of his that I have not yet read, so new De Haven is on the horizon for me!

De Haven’s most recent novel, “It’s Superman!” is a kind of Superman reboot, inspired by the strips of the 1930s-1950s, “in which the hero is less concerned with super-villains and Lex Luthor and more with clearing slums … and exposing corrupt politicians.” It’s very good.

From Wikipedia:

The author noted in an interview that he agreed with Robert Crumb’s observation that the Thirties was the pinnacle of American culture. He also notes in the same interview that he finds truth to Art Spiegelman’s statement “that we are, for whatever reason, most nostalgic for the decade before the one we were born in”, as he was born in the Forties

The 1930s were certainly a great period in American culture, though I don’t know if they were the pinnacle.

As for being most nostalgic for the decade before the one we were born in — I say baloney. That would make me most nostalgic for the 1950s, which is a decade I have little interest in. If I had to pick favorite American decades that I did not live through, I’d pick the 1930s, 1940s and maybe I’d throw in the 1960s and 1970s, which I was too young to fully appreciate.

Other than the rise of the tech sector, the 1980s and 1990s were not very interesting for American culture — although they were very interesting, both personally and professionally, for me individually.

Arguably the 1990s were the peak of American prosperity and influence. There’s a funny post about that:

The Matrix described 1999 as the peak of human civilization and I laughed because that would obviously not age well but then the next 23 years happened and now I’m like yeah okay maybe the machines had a point

That was posted in 2022; four years later, 1999 is looking better and better.

And another:

it is may 5th, 2000. you are in the crowd at 30 rockefeller plaza watching steely dan perform “peg” on the today show. al gore is up in the polls. a few miles south, the twin towers stand tall, a potent symbol of the might of american capital. everything is going great 👍

If you’re a Steely Dan fan, do watch the video at the preceding link and cry for a lost, under-appreciated golden age.