Via Cory Doctorow at Boing Boing. Thanks!
Predicting the future isn’t what science fiction is for, says Cory. Science fiction reflects the aspirations and anxieties that people have about technology at the moment it was written.
It’s not just technology. It’s also politics and social change. And it applies to fantasy. H.P. Lovecraft in real life was a full-throated bigot who feared invading hordes of filthy mongrel immigrants; he turned that into some of the most powerful horror and fantasy written (enjoyed by legions, including the descendants of those same filthy mongrel immigrants). Star Trek has always been a reflection of whatever was going on in the news at the time the shows and movies aired.
Cory covers a lot of ground in this lively interview with Utah Public Radio’s Access Utah:
In a recent column, Doctorow says that “all the data collected in giant databases today will breach someday, and when it does, it will ruin peoples’ lives. They will have their houses stolen from under them by identity thieves who forge their deeds (this is already happening); they will end up with criminal records because identity thieves will use their personal information to commit crimes (this is already happening); … they will have their devices compromised using passwords and personal data that leaked from old accounts, and the hackers will spy on them through their baby monitors, cars, set-top boxes, and medical implants (this is already happening)…” We’ll talk with Cory Doctorow about technology, privacy, and intellectual property.
Cory Doctorow is the co-editor of popular weblog Boing Boing and a contributor to The Guardian, Publishers Weekly, Wired, and many other newspapers, magazines and websites. He is a special consultant to the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a non-profit civil liberties group that defends freedom in technology law, policy, standards and treaties. Doctorow is also an award-winning author of numerous novels, including “Little Brother,” “Homeland,” and “In Real Life.”
Via Jason Weisberger, Boing Boing, who misses them too.
Scientists study the brain activity of people who claim to be able to do just fine on five hours or less sleep per night. Research finds that these people might be more efficient than the rest of us at performing the memory consolidation that sleep provides. They might also be falling asleep for a minute or two at a time when things get boring. And maybe these short sleepers are just kidding themselves about how they function well on very little sleep.
I need more sleep than I’d like. Sunday, Monday, and Tuesday nights I got four to five hours of sleep per night, and suffered for it. By Thursday and Friday I was a wreck. Last night I slept eleven hours and today it feels like my brain is packed in cotton.
A “fucking disaster,” says Cory Doctorow at Boing Boing.
Animation set to the words of a 2007 interview with the late actor.
Via Jason Weisberger, Boing Boing. Thanks!
Via Rob Beschizza, Boing Boing. Thanks!
Lettering became a separate specialty early in the evolution of the comic book art and business . Letterers evolved special tricks for making words legible and attractive on cheap low-quality paper.
Via David Pescovitz, Boing Boing. Thanks!
E.J. Masicampo posed the question to his two-year-old:
I’m teaching a moral psychology class this semester, and we spent part of the first day discussing the trolley problem, which is a frequently used ethical dilemma in discussions of morality. When I returned home that night and was playing trains with my son, I thought it would be interesting to see his response to the trolley problem. I recorded his response so that I could share and discuss it with my class, given especially that we also will be discussing moral development from birth onward. My wife and I are constantly talking with our son about how properly to treat others — so this has been teachable moment both for my class and for our son!
The Trolley Problem:
The trolley problem is a thought experiment in ethics. The general form of the problem is this: There is a runaway trolley barreling down the railway tracks. Ahead, on the tracks, there are five people tied up and unable to move. The trolley is headed straight for them. You are standing some distance off in the train yard, next to a lever. If you pull this lever, the trolley will switch to a different set of tracks. However, you notice that there is one person on the side track. You have two options: (1) Do nothing, and the trolley kills the five people on the main track. (2) Pull the lever, diverting the trolley onto the side track where it will kill one person. Which is the most ethical choice?
Via Mark Frauenfelder, Boing Boing. Thanks!
Via Andrea James, Boing Boing. Thanks!
“If you look closely you can see the age at which children stop being amused and start being embarrassed by their parents.”
Source: Xeni Jardin, Boing Boing. Thanks!
The glasses! The medallions! The poet shirt!
Only Sammy could make 70s fashion look good.
Mark Frauenfelder on Boing Boing demonstrates a method that looks so easy even I couldn’t screw it up.
You never have to wash it or worry about dings and dents. David Pescovitz at Boing Boing has more.
David Pescovitz on Boing Boing is loving it:
What the what?
Cory Doctorow has more at Boing Boing.
Sculptor builds tiny, elaborate treehouses in house-plants – Cory Doctorow – Boing Boing
Cornell economist Robert Frank studies the role luck plays in the outcomes of successful people, and the hostility that comes from suggesting luck plays a role in success.
Behavioral economist on why Americans freak out when you attribute their success to luck -Cory Doctorow, Boing Boing:
Frank’s argument: being born to a rich, privileged family is sometimes sufficient to guarantee success, even for people who aren’t very good at their jobs and don’t work very hard; meanwhile, being born into a family that lacks wealth and privilege can sometimes prevent people from rising in society, even if they are very good and work very hard.
In my observation most successful people are lucky and work hard. I’ve known many unsuccessful people who work hard, and a few successful people who were lazy and lucky.
From my life experience I conclude that good luck is essential to success, and hard work is helpful.
In early 2015, Reddit published a transparency report that contained heading for National Security Requests, noting, “As of January 29, 2015, reddit has never received a National Security Letter, an order under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, or any other classified request for user information.”
Reddit’s Thursday update omits that section.
“Warrant canaries” are a response to the practice by governments of serving warrants on service providers that include gag orders forbidding the service from disclosing the warrant’s existence.
Service providers get around the gag order by “publishing regular transparency reports listing the number of secret warrants received to date as “0,” then omitting the section dealing with those warrants once the first warrant has been served.”
Reddit’s Warrant Canary just died [Cory Doctorow – Boing Boing]
The Guardian asked several writers to list up to ten rules for writing (inspired by Elmore Leonard’s little book, 10 Rules of Writing).
I’ve bookmarked the Guardian’s articles for later reading. For now, this:
“You know that sickening feeling of inadequacy and over-exposure you feel when you look upon your own empurpled prose? Relax into the awareness that this ghastly sensation will never, ever leave you, no matter how successful and publicly lauded you become. It is intrinsic to the real business of writing and should be cherished” (Will Self)
Jerktech is the very apt epithet for the class of “disruptive” startups that sell things that don’t belong to them, like parking spots and restaurant reservations, simply raising the prices of them and making access to public resources a factor of your disposable income.